Minifield Family

Tianna Johnson-Minifield, sister of D'Londre Minifield, at the scene where her brother was fatally shot shortly after his death in 2016. Police said Minifield killed himself after being chased by police, but Minifield's family says he was shot by police.

WINCHESTER — Did a prone D’Londre Minifield fatally shoot himself in the head in 2016 or was he shot by police as he fled from officers?

The attorney for Minifield’s mother wants a jury to decide in a civil trial scheduled to begin in federal court in Harrisonburg on Aug. 5. But the attorney representing the two Winchester police officers accused in a civil suit of killing Minifield will ask Judge Michael F. Urbanski on Wednesday to throw out the case. The officers were never charged criminally

“This case has just been hanging around and delayed because the plaintiff had multiple lawyers over a long time and sued so many other people,” attorney Julia B. Judkins said on Monday about her motion for summary judgement. “The state examined their guns, and they weren’t fired. So I don’t know what else they’re supposed to do.”

But attorney Christopher E. Brown, who represents Jacqueline Minifield-Brown in the civil suit, said the police account of what happened on Feb. 28, 2016, is filled with inconsistencies that a jury should examine. Rather than an open-and-shut case, Brown argues in a motion to be filed today that it is plausible that Sgt. Christopher Eric Ivins or Officer Stephanie Nan Sills shot Minifield in the back of the head as he climbed a chain-link fence behind the Grace Community Church at 2333 Roosevelt Blvd.

“Failing to acknowledge evidence that supports the plaintiff’s claims doesn’t make [them] go away,” Brown wrote. “There is a clear dispute as to whether the decedent took his own life or was shot by Officer Sills or Officer Ivins.”

The incident began with a fight near a home in the 2000 block of Roosevelt Boulevard, called in to police at 4:05 p.m., according to Winchester and state police reports provided by the Minfield family to The Winchester Star last year. Police were told that a man named Joshua Alexander Brown had been involved in a fight and might be armed. He was never charged.

Shortly afterward, police spotted Devon Irwin Brown, Joshua Brown’s brother. They said he was walking on Wilson Boulevard with a man that turned out to be Minifield. Devon Brown told state police in an interview that he complied with officers’ commands to stop, but Minifield ran.

The pursuit ended behind Grace Community Church at 4:15 p.m., where Ivins and Sills had Minifield cornered. Sills was then a rookie cop in her first few months on the job. Ivins was her field-training officer.

Ivins told state police Minifield stumbled near a snow bank and lay on his stomach with his feet pointed toward Wilson Boulevard and his head toward the fence about 15 yards away from Ivins. Ivins said he repeatedly screamed at Minifield to show his hands, which were under his body, but Minifield refused.

Sills, who was to the left of Ivins, said she fired her Taser at Minifield. According to the state police report, Taser prongs were later removed from Minifield’s dreadlocks. Ivins said he then saw a snub-nosed .38 caliber revolver — the gun was reported stolen from an unlocked vehicle in Frederick County on Nov. 15, 2015 — in Minifield’s right hand.

Ivins said he yelled “Gun!” and was about to shoot at Minifield when Minifield shot himself. Ivins and Sills said they then rolled Minifield over and found the pistol under him. In photos provided by Brown on Monday to The Star, Brown is lying on his back about three feet from the fence with his head turned away from it.

In disputing Ivins and Sills’ account of the death, Brown made several assertions about why the case should go to trial. They include:

Witnesses Kelly Michelle Grafton and Alliyah Green’s statements that they saw Minifield pulled from the fence by police.

Gunshot residue tests were not performed on Ivins, Minifield or Sills.

Blood patterns on and around Minifield were inconsistent with the officers’ account of the shooting.

Questions about which police pistols were provided to state police for ballistics testing.

The shooting report states that DNA testing on blood on the pistol muzzle indicated Minifield couldn’t be eliminated as a contributor. But the chances of another contributor were one in 7.2 billion. However, Brown argued that the revolver may have been planted by police. He cited recent reports of similar instances in police-involved shootings in Baltimore and Chicago in which police were found to have planted guns.

In a separate motion, Brown argued that the jury shouldn’t be informed of the 20-year-old Minifield’s extensive criminal record, which included convictions for malicious wounding and robbery. Brown also said the jury shouldn’t know about toxicological test results on Minifield. The tests said Minifield, who grew up in Winchester and was living in Stephens City, was found to have cocaine and anti-anxiety medication in his system.

Judkins said if the case goes to trial, it’s important the jurors know about Minifield’s record and the drugs in his system. She said they establish motives for him fleeing police.

“He had a [stolen] gun. He was a convicted felon, and there were multiple outstanding warrants for his arrest,” she said. “Plus he had cocaine on him. It was found not only in his system, but on him.”

— Contact Evan Goodenow at egoodenow@winchesterstar.com

(18) comments

njohnson446

Listened to this on the scanner as it was happening. You could hear the officers through their microphone that's connected to the dispatcher. You could hear the officers running but no gunshot heard. This was before body cameras unfortunately. Why doesn't the recording clear this up?

Jasba64

This is a total waste of the courts time. The bullet matched his gun. Family is just trying to make some money off of this. At least we taxpayers didn't have to support the thug in prison for the rest of his life.

ShackMaster

So the plaintiff's attorney accuses the defense of failing to acknowledge certain evidence and then turns around and says that the criminal record of the deceased is irrelevant???

Conservative

He was of no worth to society. His mama sent him to live in Winchester because she didn't want to take care of him in Petersburg where they were living and he kept getting into trouble. Now his mama cares. Nobody else does, though. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Mark Anderson

Read your paragraph again, and think of it with a historical context. Politics aside, is this the kind of statement you want to leave behind? Is this the heart you want to be known for? Granted, you say these things with the cover of anonymity, however slight, but this can't be the legacy you hope to leave.

Conservative

Politics? This isn't about politics. This is about a dead convicted felon who took the easy way out. Garbage, imho. My conscience is clear. I do not suffer fools.

CRT

Ha! Says the Trump cultist, Birther conspiracy theory believing fool.

Spock Here

Wow, the "sanctity of life" crowd is going strong this morning

jwbbud

sometimes the truth hurts...My legacy isnt gonna be im a snowflake like yourself!

CRT

Snowflake? Like those who whine about Starbucks having red cups in December or that some store employees don't say the greeting they prefer?

fed up

He had a stolen gun, he was a convicted felon, he had several warrants against him, plus cocaine on him. What more do you need to know?

Mark Anderson

How about the truth? Whatever that may be.

Conservative

The truth is that his mama is just looking for a payout, because in his short life, he didn't amount to anything at all, and took the coward's way out.

jwbbud

a VSP police investigation was conducted, you calling all them liars?

Mark Anderson

"a VSP police investigation was conducted, you calling all them liars?" You saying that's never happened?

Mark Anderson

"a VSP police investigation was conducted, you calling all them liars?" However, that's not what I am saying, I am not really saying anything. The article raises a few valid questions concerning the extent of the investigation, however.

CRT

Yeah, because cops are judge, jury and executioner, amirite?

Steve Cunningham

No CRT, this matter was settled in criminal court, where the cops were not charged by the grand jury nor a judge in a court of law.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.