No matter who the eventual Democratic presidential candidate will be — whether any of the so-called Big Three (Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren) — he or she is going to be playing to an inside straight when the American people get around to voting roughly 14 months from now. That is, if party leaders don’t start dealing in reality and at least give the economy passing scrutiny — which was not done in Thursday night’s third cattle call of a debate (smaller herd, 10 instead of 20).

Right now, let’s admit it, the economy, with its astoundingly low unemployment numbers, is in good shape. But anything can happen in 14 months, an eternity in politics. In fact, Democrats seemed to be giving business and industry at least a passing thought a few weeks back when “recession” seemed to tumble frequently from their mouths. But come the debate, “economy” was only mentioned once, and in passing, by Julian Castro.

Also overlooked or ignored were the words “debt” and “deficit,” but then those were terms seldom uttered by today’s Democrats anyway, spendthrifts as they tend to be. Still, when they have a chance to hammer the Republicans on those issues, one would think they would do so with alacrity. But no, which suggests there are at least some limits to hypocrisy.

Someday, though, the economic debate must be engaged. First, though, it may behoove Democrats to come up with some measure of philosophy that is not totally “tax, tax, tax — spend, spend, spend.”


So, what did the Democrats talk about for nearly three hours Thursday in Houston? Well, the Big Three spent upwards of the first 30 minutes detailing how many angels were on the head of their particular health-care plans. During this interlude, Mr. Castro embarrassed himself relative to Mr. Biden with his implications about Alzheimer’s disease. And, after a half-hour of going back and forth about numbers of folks actually covered by each plan and whether any or all of them would send private insurance to its doom, Kamala Harris lamented, “This discussion has given the American people a headache.” A few minutes later, Pete Buttigieg added that the debates were fast becoming “unwatchable.”

There’s a reason for that. Too much philosophical homogeneity on the stage, plus a lack of memorable statements or moments. It tells you something when Beto O’Rourke, of all people, provided the line of the night when, questioned by ABC interrogator David Muir whether his “buyback” proposal for “assault weapons” amounted to “confiscation,” he said, “Hell, yes, we’re going to take away your AR-15, your AK-47.”

And most all America cringed.

(6) comments


After the great tax cut for the wealthy, the GOP philosophy is no tax, no tax, no tax- spend, spend, spend.


Thank you, Beto, for that line. It will exist forever! lol!

Jim McCarthy

Oh, Star, you can only hope that your leader's tax cuts and tariffs fail to damage the economy even more. That is its resilience underwritten by strong measures under the Obama administration. BTW, that goes for your praise of the unemployment/employment rates. None of it due to this President.


The Obamaconomy is hardly the reason for the present economic boom. I can imagine that if things went suddenly sour, all the Democrat hacks would then point squarely at Trump. Make up your mind, cap’n; river only runs one way.


Obama. The great apologizer. "You didn't build that!". A shyster and a clown.


Unbelievable. Laughable for its delusion.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.