President Trump certainly took his Royal American time deciding whether or not, as promised, he would withdraw from the Paris climate accords. Last Monday, though, he finally made official what many considered fait accompli: He formally announced his intent to pull out of the sweeping climate agreement.

After all, the president pledged almost ad nauseam during his campaign for president to make such a move. It was about as ironbound a pledge as was his vow to name a conservative to the Supreme Court. In other words, he said repeatedly he would do so.

About 200 countries signed on to the Paris accords, which were negotiated during 2015. There was enormous pressure from the United States, under then-President Barack Obama, for an agreement and for other nations to be signatories.

In fact, as you may recall, this country agreed to participate solely because of an executive order issued by Mr. Obama. Though treaties with other nations are required by the Constitution to be approved by the U.S. Senate, Mr. Obama never submitted it to that body. He understood that the duly elected representatives of the American people would not approve.

Provisions of the accords allow most countries to set their own targets for reducing carbon emissions. China, our most serious economic and military foe, in essence agreed it would at some date in the future begin to reduce emissions.

But the United States was required by the accords to slash emissions immediately and dramatically, to the point our economy would have been put at a disadvantage.

Climate change is a concern, of course. But what our competitors would prefer not be made clear is that, virtually alone among industrialized nations, the United States has been reducing emissions and continues to do so at a rapid pace.

And, there is this: This country, from which about 15% of carbon emissions come, is not the world’s most serious climate change threat. China, at 30%, earns that title.

Americans will continue to make rapid, major strides in reducing carbon emissions. But holding us to the Paris accords would wreck our economy — while doing nothing about nations such as China and India, where carbon emissions continue to go up.

For most of his presidency, Mr. Trump could do nothing about the Paris agreement. One of its stipulations was that no nation could withdraw during the pact’s first three years.

The accords went into effect on Nov. 4, 2016. Thus, Mr. Trump declared his intent at the 11th hour, 55 minutes. In other words, he moved as early as he could.

(3) comments


The front page of the Star says "Freedom is not free". That applies to more than our veterans. If we are the leaders of the world, as we like to say, we need to show it regarding our planet. Will it cost money, yes it will, what doesn't? Trump's view is very, very short sighted.


The world ain't kidergarden, they aren't going to follow us just because we do something. Each country will do as will suit their best interests, and, for very few, is a green agenda in their best interest, at least in the immediate future, which is all that counts when failure to give the people something tangible can have dire results.


We've reduced. No one else has. Why do we need to be in the accord if we keep reducing?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.