The last update I received from the hip, woke generation informed me that they are now up to 124 genders and apparently still looking for more. I immediately recalled the plans to open a new high school in 2023. A quick Duck Duck Go search of the Frederick County records revealed NO updated plans to incorporate 124 gender fluid (or whatever) bathrooms in this new high school, just the usual two flavors.

This shortsightedness is sure to cost the county many tens of millions of dollars to correct. Presidential candidate Julian Castro pontificated on the need to assure the availability of abortions for Transgender Males. Yup, you heard it right, folks, abortions for 'guys'. So you know the Democrats are gonna legislate 124 bathrooms in every school, roadside rest stop, restaurant, national park, etc.

Just like in the commercials; "BUT WAIT," Aylor Middle School just broke ground for its new iteration. Again, no bathroom considerations in the plans, the usual two kinds. I'm giving 'em some slack, OK, just middle-schoolers, say maybe about 62 bathrooms should be just right.

So if you think each and every one of the 124 genders deserves their own bathroom, be sure to vote a straight Democrat ticket every time.

If you still believe there are the same two genders that have been around since Adam and Eve, congratulations on maintaining your common sense. Vote as you wish.

As for me, I'm buying stock in Don's John's and any company that converts classroom trailers into bathroom trailers.

Jim Henry

Frederick County

(56) comments

DaWholeTruth

BTW Letter To The Editor Writer: Your mildly comedic letter addressing a not so equally comedic topic was a very uncritical way in hopefully helping people to manage to see the absurdity and the extremism of the alt-left's position on all things.

Spock Here

Good gravy, now I know what a tent revival must be like, only on steroids. Preacherman needs to chill.

DaWholeTruth

So glad we've reminded you all that not only do we each have a right to call out evil acts but an obligation - liberals love the "holier than thou" rhetoric meant as yet another feeble, futile attempt to silence those who know the differences between right and wrong, good and bad. If you wish to refer to this as "preaching" so be it, for in fact, Christians are indeed called forth to minister & spread the word - in doing so we absolutely condemn the acts of perversions such as abortion (btw, search the word "fetus" to find that all mainstream Dictionaries define it as an unborn baby) and teaching innocent children that they are somehow neither male nor female but either "neither" or "both". You can attempt to proclaim "tolerance" but acts which defile the very nature & inherent goodness bestowed by our Creator (as the Founding Fathers so aptly referred) need to be condemned and not condoned, and the original writer of this letter shall surely be neither dismayed or dissuaded by labeling him a critique of what is inherently wrong. So sorry, but you do retain the option to remove your presence so you need not hear.

Spock Here

I understand. Full moon tomorrow

DaWholeTruth

Lastly....it was indeed one of your own on here "Joehenry" who brought forth the mention of religion into this discussion - NOT the original letter writer NOR I. How apropos.

DaWholeTruth

As I mentioned - visiting the giant ball of string is NOTHING we would have interest in. Instead, we like to travel to the "world's largest brick" in Alabama. It reminds us of some folk's mindsets.

DaWholeTruth

Christians are called upon to judge the sin Jim, just not the sinner, and nowhere within the original letter to the editor nor within subsequent comments is any individual or even group or organization properly named - it is merely the chronic manipulation of the group-think extremist left to avoid topics at hand by utilizing science-based facts and instead merely refer to those who uphold traditional Biblical values as they have existed and persisted for centuries as "haters" and being "judgmental". Once more, to defend the faith is to call out sin and denounce sinful acts. At no point, despite your very convenient but baseless accusations - is any person's soul or eternal resting place discussed. And again we attest with certainty: There are but two genders and there exists no degree of cosmetic surgery that will ever be able to alter what God, with the inception of His biology, has created. Nothing. Sorry Jim and the P.C. Police Force at N.F.: A potato is NOT a carrot. Never was, never will be.

DaWholeTruth

Just so ya'll know: I've just only today invested my entire life savings in Don's Johns and preparing to live the rest of my days amidst immense wealth and luxury as soon as the left puts the pressure on the government to equip all public facilities the nation over with 124 restrooms to accommodate the proper number of genders we now have......as we speak I'm avidly perusing chateaus on the French Riviera and I recommend to you all who so staunchly defend this new age bioengineering to do the same!

Joehenry

This is fn hilarious. You can do what you want, when you want, yet you try to tell other people what they have to do, what YOU expect them to do, to conform to your view. Wow, a-hole, when did you change? You used to tell us people are people. WTF?


DaWholeTruth

CRT: Never used abusive language to you whatsoever or again - you would be able to document such transgression. However I do extend to you a hearty thank you for bidding us all adieu!

DaWholeTruth

So the Bible is filled with "allegories" - Just a quick question...What "in the name of God" (so to speak) do you liberals refer to in terms of your 124 different genders, preserving a "man's" right to have an abortion, the so-called ability to merely wish oneself into transforming from male to female & vice-versa, that gender doesn't even actually exist - everyone is "fluid", that the feds should "buy back" your guns when no one bought them from the feds to begin with, that not adhering to our state's federal laws, (i.e.: "sanctuary cities") isn't really "unlawful", etc. etc. I mean, IMO, these concepts are both new and bizarre (i.e.: loopy) whereas the Bible has lasted well over 2,000 years, has billions of followers worldwide, and Constitutional law itself is based upon its Commandments. Party of "science" anyone??

CRT

"...the Bible has lasted well over 2,000 years, has billions of followers worldwide..." The same can be said for the Quran. Constitutional law is based on any commandments. Do you think the writers of the Constitution just forgot to add any references to religion other than to ban the establishment of a state one and to ban religious tests for public office or employment?

DaWholeTruth

Despite that neither of these fallacies has anything to do with my original post - the original Hebrew Bible was written in approximately the year 1200 BC & the New Testament (intimately intertwined) was written in approximately 50AD - The "Quran"? About 362AD.....looong after the O.T. Further, "Mohammed" never proclaimed to be the Christ or a godhead w/I that text. The Declaration which heralds our independence - is replete with references to a Supreme Being, i.e.: God, & all laws are inherently interrelated with Judeo-Christian ethics.. Following then this quick reply therefore to your unrelated blather meant to distract and deflect: Now, I ask one more time from the party of "science": What do ya'll call your rationale behind there purportedly being 124 genders, preserving abortion rights for men, switching your DNA from male to female or vice versa with merely "wishing" it so (even never-ending surgeries can actually make it so) etc. etc. Lot's O' Luck....I need documentable scientific evidence, but of course, from the party of "science".

ShruggingAtlas

*CRICKETS*

CRT

The Declaration of Independence has nothing do with our laws or system of government. You didn't answer my question, why do you think the writers of the Constitution neglected to include any language about religion except to ban the establishment of a state religion and to ban a religious test for public office or employment? Why does that one seem to stump you? As for the Quran, okay, it's only been around about 1400 years, but there are more Muslims than Christians in the world.

DaWholeTruth

SO sorry yet again CRT - Your facts are NON-factual. The largest religion in the world is CHRISTIANITY with approximately 33% of the world's population adherents; NOT Islam @ about 20%. Catholics alone (merely one sext of Christianity) number over 1.313 Billion and GROWING. And AGAIN: The Declaration declares WHY we were separating from England with God being intertwined thoroughly throughout the entire document. The Constitution is HOW we are proposing to govern colonies. Talk to a history professor perhaps & stop gleaning "information" from Bill Mahar?? And I'll ask you for the THIRD & FINAL time: HOW do YA'LL describe your moronic ideologies re: how one magically changes from male to female by thinking it so, how & why males need to preserve their right to abortion, how a fetus is not a human child despite it being defined as such by every long-established Dictionary, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. **Please, again, cease & desist from re-directing and ANSWER these queries with SCIENTIFICALLY based impartial peer-reviewed responses that can be independently verified. Hey....THANKS!

CRT

I admit, I was mistaken. Christianity is number one. Happy? So you concede that that our government is not to be run based on any religion. Good! I'd match my knowledge of history against yours anytime. As for your gender questions, I'm neither a physician nor a psychologist so I'm not qualified to answer them. I do believe that all people deserve to be treated with dignity.

DaWholeTruth

Well CRT: To be EXACT, you were wrong on ALL the supposed "facts" you doled out - Christianity is the largest religion and the Koran is NOT the same age as the Bible by a long shot....I'd recommend you attaining "facts" from an altogether different source. Secondly, the US Constitution & ALL related documents ONLY tate that there is to be no "state-run" religion as...….the pilgrims came here to advocate FOR religious FREEDOM - NOT freedom FROM religion - our currency mentions God, our patriotic hymns sing of God, and recent CONSTITUTIONAL rulings have ALLOWED religious SYMBOLS to remain on PUBLIC PROPERTY. So NO "conceding", only correcting you once AGAIN (This is TIRING)…...BTW, I presume you are in the midst of compiling all that triple-blind, scientific journal peer reviewed, mainstream scientific data that evidences precisely how a male transforms into a female via "wishful" thinking & vice-versa, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. (I presume there is some level of fairy dust involved in the transformation).

CRT

My, but you aren't very gracious. Maybe I was wrong to concede error and should have changed documents with a Sharpie. Actually, once the Pilgrims and Puritans arrived here seeking the escape persecution, they persecuted based on religion. Look up the case or Roger Williams. They also weren't kind to Catholics. See it wasn't the persecution they objected to, it was who was doing it. A sage such as yourself must know that the "Under God" and "In God We Trust" were added during the Red Scare in the 1950s. One recent SCOTUS ruling applied to a cross on public land and it was a narrow ruling. Why are you so obsessed with the gender questions. I addressed it. You are (to use a medical term) a jerk, so I'm out.

Joehenry

This is to Shruggingatlas and DaWholeTruth, neither of you have even a quarter of a clue about the world around you. Your arguments are based on what the many do but the Constitution of the United States defends the rights of the few that think for themselves against government. Read the document. You both bring religion into this argu

DaWholeTruth

We so TRY to achieve that "quarter of a clue" about the world around us and have repeatedly asked CRT (the "bloke" who thoroughly misinformed you about the largest religion being Islam) HOW does one essentially magically transform from a male to a female and vice-versa by wishing it so, HOW are genders "fluid" when chromosomes determine gender, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. We requested only response from scientific peer-reviewed independent unbiased journals that we may in turn verify, but thus far - have none. Please grant us your own wisdom

Joehenry

Clearly you do not understand the word identifies. You demand to be informed on how people physically change from man or woman to what they identify with. It is not necessarily a physical change and you know this. You prefer to berate people that don't prescribe to your beaten into you thought process. Being retired I would think you could find better things to do with your time like visiting the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota. No, you choose to throw out upon the world judgement and absurdly rambling thoughts and have the audacity to say you want scientific peer review. Once again I reccomend you grow up. Ever heard of the golden rule?

Joehenry

You both bring religion into this discussion to defend an impossible point. This country was founded on a separation on church and state. For good reason. They are bad partners. Church destroys the state. Always has, always will. The other bloke pointed out that more follow the Koran than the bible and he is right. Wake up, grow up, and see things as they are.... or just accept your ignorance both of you and leave good people alone. You have no idea what is going on in this world.

DaWholeTruth

Sorry James, The other "bloke" you refer to is precisely THAT - a bloke. Her "information" wasn't correct and in fact, the LARGEST religion in the world is: Christianity: with approximately 1/3 of the earths population as adherents - totaling around 33% and growing, NOT Islam. Catholics alone comprise (merely one sext of Christianity,) over 1.313 Billion and also growing - especially in the Continent of: AFRICAN. So, NO, he/she (not that such masculine/feminine pronouns ought be used as leftist extremists do believe there are 124 different genders which are all "fluid" btw) is NOT correct in asserting that more people follow a Koran as opposed to the Bible. So we'll "both" attribute your untruths to being gullible and misguided instead of utilizing the "ignorant" verbiage as you so quickly did. Lastly, our laws are fundamentally based upon Judeo-Christian ethics (read the Declaration as to WHY we were separating) and the DIVISION of church and state was meant to be just that: a division and not an ABSENSE. As is explained plainly and simply in layman's terms: The Founding Fathers (all Christians btw) directed freedom OF religion - NOT freedom FROM religion.

Joehenry

So freedom of religion includes berating people. You claim to be catholic and then spout on when someone does something you find wrong. I do believe your bible states he without sin cast the first stone and only god can judge man. Leave people alone. They separated church and state so the laws would make sense to all people including different religions.

ShruggingAtlas

This country was born of a revolt from the English crown, not God. Your arrogance demonstrates the problem of a secular govt in that you assume the Church was the issue, when it's always been man. Man has a fallen nature, it is corrupt, but I wonder if you can comprehend such things, given the ignorant statements that you've made so far. The results of the French and Russian revolts shows that your comment about "Church destroys the state" to be wrong, it's actually quite the opposite of what you're saying. So much for "my ignorance".

DaWholeTruth

It was "born" of a people of English ancestry who came to establish freedoms not inherent to those they lived with under British rule. Currency? God. Patriotic hymns? God. Declaration of Independence? God. And recent Supreme Court rulings? You guessed it --- YES! Symbols of GOD allowed to be kept & displayed upon governmental properties.

Joehenry

LOL. Me arrogant.

DaWholeTruth

Excellent Post ShruggingAtlas!!!

DaWholeTruth

Well Jim, You apparently do not understand the entire processes of gender reassignment surgery wherein reproductive organs are amputated whilst other, different reproductive organs are fashioned to resemble that of the "opposite" sex - (though I must admit confusion at the verbiage of "opposite" in these matters since highly confused persons insist there are at least 124 genders leaving the age old notion of the phrase "opposite sex" a misnomer presently). Secondly, there is a flagrant disparity between "berating" people and communicating the absolute and utter absurdity (at best) or downright evil (at worst and likely more accurate) in teaching children for one, that their gender "identity" is "fluid" and that neither their chromosomes nor their physical attributes dictate whether they are male or female. In fact, within the Bible (that being the text that the largest faith-based population utilizes, as opposed to the Koran as you very gullibly believed merely hours ago) it is stated that: "If anyone is caught in any transgression against God, you who are spiritual should attempt to restore him". Therefore, one is actually called upon to be an adversary against wrongs and sin; not to ignore them. God created man and woman in Genesis - not 124 genders, therefore, as Christians (i.e.: Catholics) the facts are that there are but two genders extant since the beginning of time - the fact that we point out the preposterousness of 124 genders is not something we "find" wrong; it actually IS wrong. And the aberration of people, particularly the parents & guardians of minor children, encouraging fallacies and thereafter often life-altering treatments and surgeries that futilely attempt to change what God/nature/biology has created is exceptionally misguided, genetically & biological impossible, and highly dangerous on many counts. It is difficult to perceive how one achieves a half century of life and cannot distinguish between right and wrong, or at least feels the compulsion to claim that no "right" or "wrong" exists is seriously troubling.

DaWholeTruth

BTW, that remark regarding the giant ball of string is OBVIOUSLY something we would have NO interest in whatsoever......we MUCH prefer the world's largest brick in Alabama. It reminds us of some folk's mindsets.

Ping

I have never used a public restroom (which hasn't been single user and lockable) in my life....and I'm not starting now.

Bose-Einstein

Yep, those T-rex fossils are only 6,000 years old and don't believe your lying eyes when you look through a telescope at light billions of years old.

Rattler

Dont worry spick, crt and slowe always want to push buttons. Its what they do best. No real debate fron them just whine as conservative says

Rattler

Im not an atheist. Dont know if you are talking about me??

ralcabin

No, not you.

Spock Here

Why do people like you obsess over bathrooms?

Rattler

Because it opens up a whole new can of worms. I dont want a perv masquerading as "transgender" in the bathroom with my child. Just put a gender neutral bathroom in addition to m/f. Even " straight" people with children or issues with going potty with other people around will use it too. There is no need for all these different bathrooms

ShruggingAtlas

Oh I don't know, maybe it's because perv enablers like you want to push their warped, satanic worldview on kids and without parental consent?

Spock Here

So, for you, respecting all living, breathing, walking, talking human beings and thinking they are all entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness makes someone "perv enablers like you want to push their warped, satanic worldview on kids and without parental consent?" You become more bizarre with every post You know, some people spout "faith and moral values" Others live it.

Rattler

Nothing bizzare about comment. .situation you are alone with your little girl. She has to potty bad. So who is going to protect your little girl while in bathroom (thiss assuming you are male hence girl child). Would you have a problem with a pervert masquerading as transgender alone with her to do harm??. Thats why gender neutral bathroom.

ShruggingAtlas

Yeah, you can have those without being a perv. You run afoul of nature, you want permission to do unnatural things, those don't fall under "natural rights". Somehow, I don't believe when Jefferson wrote those words, he wasn't referring to perverts having access to children as a "right".

Spock Here

I simply feel that all living, breathing, walking, talking human beings are all entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and neither of us has a clue what the founding fathers would have thought. "Pervs" are as much entitled to happiness as I am, as long as no crimes are committed. It's nice outside, you need to get your Sinners Repent sign and go for a walk.

ShruggingAtlas

Yes, we do. They (Founders) wrote very extensively and their opinions are in the Federalist and anti-Federalist papers. You could get yourself a copy of the ratification debates by looking in the Library of Congress.



The fatal flaw in your "logic" is that you really have no moral base, preferring fleeting feelings of fancy to actual right and wrong. You could wake up tomorrow and support bestiality and pedophilia (as you seem to approve of "as long as it's legal") if your friends thought it was cool. As far as repenting and sinning go, look in the mirror and take your advice.

DaWholeTruth

Ignoring or enabling extremist viewpoints that fly in the face of Biblical text (i.e.: God) is not "living the faith" Spock, and as you attest you're a Christian (and I don't doubt it) you know better...…..judging anyone's soul is up to God ALONE, but waging a battle against immorality and downright evil is, in fact, our job. Remember the hymnal "We are Christian Warriors; Soldiers of Christ"...….there has been and always will be a battle between good & evil - and the letter writer very comedically (again) simply attempted to demonstrate the absurdity of extremist, counter-culture deeds. He in fact never made mention of God OR religion in his tongue-in-cheek letter but in fact it was a "joehenry" handle who brought forth that discussion.

Rattler

Oops spock

Rattler

Oops spock

CRT

If you believe that Adam and Eve were real people, you may be the one with the problem.

Rattler

And that comment right there is part of problem in our great country

ralcabin

So you are an atheist too?

CRT

Not an atheists, but I know an allegory when I read one. The Bible is full of them. Do you really believe the story of Noah? Jonah?

ShruggingAtlas

If you believe that we're here by some cosmic accident, or have no evidence other than phony, disproven "theories" that humans evolved from lesser species, you might be the one with the problem.

Rattler

Spock, when i say pervs I'm not talking about the games you play in the bedroom. These pervs out to do harm to others do not deserve life,liberty or happiness. BTW. You didnt answer my ?? What would you do in the situation. Use your brain and not you smart a.....

Rattler

No answer. Again just babble from the pot stirrers. Nothing of real substance to say.

DaWholeTruth

Hey Rattler: These folks are not ONLY pot stirrers, but pot tokers as well. Another phenomenal concept from the left: Legalize yet MORE intoxicants! No sense in trying to reason with them (tho I did leave CRT finally speechless) - brains are fried.

Spock Here

I find the term "perv" rather disgusting myself, but, in any case, any person disguising him or herself as the opposite sex to prey on children, in a bathroom, hallway, airplane, whatever, is a disgusting human being, and in fact, criminal, so they lose their rights. I agree on single use bathrooms, and that's what we see in public most times anymore. If my child had to "potty bad", and knowing if he or she is old enough to "go it alone" and don't talk to strangers, they go. If they are not deemed old enough to go by themselves, the parent escorts the child into the parent's ID bathroom, and goes in the stall with them. I have done this and had others do it while I was there. People don't freak out. I do give you kudos for distinguishing what goes on in a bedroom vs child predators; however as you see others don't make that distinction and decide who on this earth has a moral compass or not.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.