Physicians who care for women in our community are deeply concerned about the temporary closure of mammography services at Winchester Medical Center. We know that regular screening mammograms save lives. We speak for a large number of physicians. We have NO concerns regarding the quality of mammograms that have been done at our local hospital. What we are most worried about is that this situation will be misrepresented and that it will frighten women and keep them from being screened.

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer in women. It is the second leading cause of cancer death behind lung cancer. The overall lifetime risk of developing breast cancer for US women is 1 in 8. Screening mammography allows for the detection of cancer before it can be felt, improving the chances of survival. Estimates of mortality reduction vary from 15 to 20%. Early diagnosis also spares patients from more radical surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Every patient should speak with their provider about the screening interval that is appropriate for them. Most experts suggest a yearly mammogram starting at age 40.

Every year each mammogram machine is inspected by a physicist to be sure that the equipment is delivering just the proper dose of radiation. Every year a report is submitted by this scientist to the state of Virginia and to the FDA in Washington, DC. On one machine, the normal report made it to Richmond but not to Washington. The absence of this piece of paper in DC triggered a review of mammography services at Winchester Medical Center.

The American College of Radiology reviewed 30 of the 30,000 mammograms done in the past year by our hospital and read by our radiologists. In about a third, they felt that the patient positioning could have been better. The positioning problems in these patients did not change the accuracy of any of the mammograms. An outside review of this tiny sample agreed that there was some issue with positioning but only in a different and much smaller number (5). Again, the diagnostic accuracy was not affected. In other words, this problem with the position of the patient on the table did not cause a cancer to be missed. Most importantly, the statistics in our community for breast cancer detection is better than the US average. We also have lower breast cancer death rates than our neighbors.

We have NO concerns about the quality of mammography services at Winchester Medical Center. With an abundance of caution our hospital, in collaboration with our radiologists, has paused screening services for a short time to allow additional training to be completed. If patients want to stay on schedule, we are sending them to the other regional Valley Health hospitals, Progressive Radiology or City Hospital in Martinsburg. Valley Health has agreed to pay for a review of a recent mammogram by an outside source if a patient is concerned. They will also cover the cost of another mammogram if this is necessary. Please call 1-888-441-5294 if you are interested in accessing any of these opportunities.

Laura Dabinett, MD James Nashed, MD

Laura Dabinett, MD

James Nashed, MD

(5) comments


I do feel training would be beneficial. My own experience has been that the tech had to repeat images because they didn't get them right the first time, even three times for one image last visit. I do not want the additional radiation by repeated attempts. This is a horribly uncomfortable procedure, and it needs to be done correctly on first try. Training should focus on placement, comfort, and communication between from tech to patient. The letter above states the patient is on a table, however, mammograms are done while the patient is standing and the breast is compressed tightly between two plates. It needs to be so e correctly on the first try.


Hence scheduling issues. Technologists need the time to do a proper mammogram and have rapport with patient.


The doctors state that lack of filing of one piece of paper caused a review which found that mammograms were not being performed correctly. They somehow see this as "overreach". How about sound oversight? I would advise women in this area to stay clear of these two docs.


Typical CRT, reading what is not written. Did you even read the article? Based on your comment I would say no, or you read what you wanted to then made something up. The article was speaking about the importance of testing and care of females. I know the part about the testing of Xray machines as I used to test Dental Xray systems at one time many years ago. The state of VA required the their systems to be tested annually as well. For Dental I do not know if this is still the case or not, as I left that field 20 years ago.


These 2 doctors are ON/GYN physicians who are well respected in our community. They used to do mammograms in their office. I do not know if these are included or still being performed. as thy were also read by radiologists reading mammo that day. I still think problems are partially caused by scheduling especially if you a newbie. At one time mammographers had to have so many mammo continued education credits for ACR. Not every patient can be positioned properly in time allowed hence the inside joke of jiffy boob. The radiologists have computer programs to help see questionable ateas. No one is infallible . Give these technologists who are very capable at there job enough time for a job well done

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.