On April 16, The Star ran an editorial titled “Biases have no role in science.”

Your editorial argued that considering the race of COVID-19 victims could lead to “false conclusions” and reflects “unscientific biases.” It also stated that “Some politicians in the United States tend to seize upon anything in attempts to woo voters.”

Your argument was that statistics showing the impact of COVID-19 on racially marginalized groups could mislead or distract the overall research on the pandemic, with an additional hint that “some politicians” might use such information to “woo voters.”

I wrote a letter in response almost immediately. I pointed out that counting and arithmetic are not unscientific. I described some solid factual reasons why African-Americans and some other groups might be more at risk from the pandemic. I noted that “statistics from many cities show that Black people in the U.S. are dying disproportionately from COVID-19. It’s not just one article from The Associated Press, as your editorial implies.” Of course, the evidence in the time passed since then for that trend has grown even more solid than it was in mid-April.

Then I stated “editorialists can nit-pick any and all of these statements. But meanwhile, just as elderly people with medical conditions like me are more at risk and should be protected, the same is true of our African-American neighbors.”

Regular readers of this page will know that every month for years a letter of mine has appeared on these pages. But this letter was not printed.

I have no entitlement to have a letter printed here each month. But when a longstanding pattern is broken, you kind of wonder why.

Every day since your editorial, and since my rebuttal was not printed, the pattern of enhanced risk for African Americans — and even greater enhanced risk for Native Americans — has become clearer. Every day it has become clearer that these communities, with their own members in the lead, must get the substantial resources they need to keep people alive.

It is definitely true that “Some politicians in the United States tend to seize upon anything in attempts to woo voters.” Yes, and some editorialists tend to support them. Today, some politicians and editorialists have “seized upon” the idea that the pandemic is not real bad, and have chosen to ignore the plain fact that it does harm some communities more. They want us to ignore the realities that risky plans to “re-open” will especially benefit those who live safely with millions to invest, and will especially harm those of us, like me, who are elderly, and those of us who will actually be put at face-to-face risk in low-paying jobs.

I agree that biases have no legitimate role in science. I wish they had no role in politics, including the policies of editorial pages.

Larry Yates is a resident of Winchester.

(13) comments


I still wonder how you can bankrupt a casino, a license to print money, can happen?? Geeze!

Doc Samson

The fact that a Leftist who thinks he's "logical" is approaching TDS levels of hatred towards Tucker Carlson, a former Leftie, should be all you need to know. I'll use a good Leftie tactic and make the wild assumption that he also has great admiration for our racist governor and sexual predator Lt. Gov...

Spock Here

You don't seem to retain information well, it appears. I've made no secret of my dislike of Northum. Whatever party affiliation Carlson is doesn't matter to me. He makes a mockery of the science and gets paid to do it.


I'm not even sure who Tucker Carlson is. This was a response to a Star editorial.

I'm not the rabid Democrat that you think I am. YOu have a very limited political knowledge if you think the world is a struggle between Fox News and the Democrats.


Spock you have to get over the HTS or going to go even more crazy when he wins again!

Spock Here

Oh goody, when he wins I hope he rides in on his "super duper missle" cheering on the medical workers who "run where the death is, beautiful thing to see" with his extra bright orange glow!


There you go again, concentrating on skin color. What a racist POS you are.

Spock Here

Commenting on a fake orange spray tan is, as you know, not really in, say, calling someone a Kenyan muslim socialist. But do continue to project


Senile? You must be thinking of Joe Biden.

Spock Here

Why don't we have actual doctors examine and test both of them? Current potus seems to be like one of those guys babbling to the pigeons in Central Park to me, but let's have doctors decide, hmmmm?


Joe Biden is a sexual predator.

Spock Here

It is fascinating and rather frightening that a, thankfully dwindling, segment of our population chooses to listen to Tucker Carlson and a sociopathic senile businessman who bankrupted nearly everything he owned, including casinos.

Spock Here

But, let them listen and follow. Thin the herd by Nov. 3rd. And if it thins bigly, I really don't care do u?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.