WINCHESTER — A proposal to build a traffic-calming roundabout on South Pleasant Valley Road continues to draw fire.

During the public comment portion of Tuesday night's City Council meeting in Rouss City Hall, five people spoke against the proposed traffic circle and another 20 submitted written concerns regarding the project. All of their comments focused on the potential impacts the roundabout could have on the residential neighborhoods west of South Pleasant Valley Road.

Katt Eaton, a Parkway Street resident who served five years on the Winchester Planning Commission before resigning from the panel in January 2020, told council the traffic circle is a bad idea and accused city officials of downplaying the amount of vehicles that could use it to enter the neighborhoods parallel to South Pleasant Valley Avenue.

"The narrow, one-way residential streets that make up our neighborhood were never designed nor intended as a through street running up from South Pleasant Valley Road," Eaton said, suggesting the roundabout would work better if moved a few blocks north to the heavily used intersection of South Pleasant Valley Road and East Cork Street.

The roundabout is proposed for inclusion in Winchester's latest update to its Comprehensive Plan, which serves as a blueprint for the city's development and growth over the next decade and beyond. Even if it is included in the plan, there is no guarantee it will ever be built.

If the roundabout is constructed, it would connect to East Leicester Street and open a travel lane linking South Pleasant Valley Road to an area adjacent to City Yards near downtown Winchester.

"That street [Leicester] is very narrow and would dump traffic out in residential neighborhoods, one of them ours," Parkway Street resident Susie Rhodes wrote in an email to council. "There is hardly room for any parking on all those narrow streets back near Leicester. Why in the world would you want a roundabout right there? This looks so disruptive."

"Many of us do not have driveways and have to park on the street," Shawnee Avenue resident Bethany Kirby said to council on Tuesday. "Many of our streets are one way, or are two way but cannot accommodate two vehicles traveling in opposite directions at the same time."

Further complicating the issue is a proposal currently before council to build 25 townhouses and an office building on a narrow, 4.3-acre stretch of land sandwiched between South Pleasant Valley Road and the backyards of several single-family homes along Opequon Avenue. The roundabout is targeted for the southern end of the 4.3 acres, but the property's owner, Schwartz Family Investments II LLC, has said it would build an access road to the townhouses and office building at that location even if the roundabout never materializes.

"To myself and many other residents, opening up Leicester Street to Pleasant Valley in any capacity, whether to grant limited access to the proposed [townhouse] development or via a full-blown traffic roundabout, seems disastrous," Kirby said.

"If we get a lot more traffic through there, there's going to be children hurt, children killed," said Shenandoah Avenue resident Deb Lloyd.

"People around here don't know how to drive," added Parkway Street resident Bruce Smith, who said he opposes both the roundabout and the proposed townhouses and office building.

On Tuesday, City Council held a first reading regarding a proposed rezoning of the 4.3 acres at South Pleasant Valley Road. Currently, single-family houses could be built there by right, but in order to build 25 townhouses, the developer needs Winchester to add a Planned Unit Development (PUD) designation to the parcel's Residential Office (RO-1) zoning. A public hearing and final vote on the rezoning is scheduled for council's next business meeting on Sept. 28.

The roundabout is being considered for inclusion in an update to Winchester's overall Comprehensive Plan. The city's Planning Commission has said it intends to issue a recommendation on the revised plan in October, then forward the item to City Council for a public hearing and final vote later this year.

— Contact Brian Brehm at

(12) comments


In addition to GIlbert's Corner area and Purcellville, don't forget about the ones in Brunswick, MD. They work. Each of those would be a full stop sign or a light.


As long as everyone understands that whoever is in the roundabout has the right of way, things are fine. You need to yield before entering.

The Node

Once you learn how roundabouts work they are much more efficient at getting cars through intersections. This is Especially true with manual transmissions as you never need to use 1st. Most of us Yankees have no clue how to properly signal your intentions entering and within the circle. A little extra enforcement should help some of our harder to teach drivers learn how to drive better.


Blondie, while I have had concerns on some roundabouts in the past (Rt. 50 and Rt. 15) years ago and the one in Purcellivlle, I will gladly eat my words. In those instances, they clearly are the better option. As to your comment that Roundabouts are dangerous...etc" is not a true statement....if it were a true statement, you would be able to back up your thoughts. As such, your comment therefore is false and misleading.


I beg tp differ, Mr. Weber. The way people drive nowadays, also texting while driving, they are dangerous. Just because you like them doesn't mean that everyone else has to like them too.


I agree with the part that Roundabouts are confusing and useless. The one in front of Timbrook was a forest to landscape the building. It did not change any traffic flow by straightening out the curve that is still there. People lost housing for this project.

Don Specht

Roundabouts work.

Examples ... the "Ranson Circle" with at least seven connecting streets, at the end of Fairfax Blvd from C Town to Ranson

The traffic circles that connect I-81, US-11, and WV-51 and bypass Inwood work well ... even better when the 81 bridge widening and the last circle are complete.

The traffice circle that serves the city of Winchester as you enter via Rt 7 has made the trip downtown easier for me and mine.


I love roundabouts, they do work very well. However opening up neighborhood streets to the volume of traffic on Pleasant Valley Road to benefit one developer is just wrong.


Roundabouts are dangerous and not useful at all.

Doc Samson

@Blondie - Going to have to disagree with you on this. If people use them correctly, they are much better at keeping traffic flowing and stop the useless "stopping" for no one at intersections...


That's just the problem, Doc Samson. People don't use them correctly, They rush through them and pay no attention to the Yield sign.

Doc Samson

Well, yeah, but that keeps it... interesting! [beam] Seriously though, I go through a couple every day and, for the most part, they keep things flowing. Not perfect but they beat non-responsive lights any day!

It would be nice if the police spent a little more time (well, okay, a LOT more time) enforcing distracted driving laws and poor driving, rather than focusing on speeding. Of course that means they would have to look up from their own devices to actually observe, rather than just relying on their radar alert... [rolleyes]

Also, thanks for being able to disagree without calling me any names or bringing Trump into the discussion! [lol][thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.