Fire Chief

William A. Garrett waits to take the oath of office as Winchester’s new Fire and Rescue chief in Rouss City Hall on June 3.

WINCHESTER — The Winchester Star has obtained information that contradicts the city’s account of what led to Winchester Fire and Rescue Chief William A. Garrett unexpectedly being out of his office for several days in November.

Numerous sources with first-hand knowledge of Rouss City Hall’s handling of the situation spoke with The Star over the course of several weeks. Since many of them are current employees of the city, they would only speak on condition of anonymity due to fear of reprisal.

The city’s official explanation for Garrett’s absence states he was out of the office for personal reasons, and he was never suspended or relieved of duty. However, The Star has learned that City Manager Eden Freeman told Garrett he was temporarily relieved of duty, and an interim chief was named to fill his position.

In an email on Tuesday, Freeman held firm to her previous statements regarding the situation, writing that “there has been a significant amount of misinformation, unfortunate rumors, and inaccurate statements that are circulating on social media and in the community.”

According to information obtained by The Star, a disciplinary action against Garrett was reportedly taken after he publicly questioned proposed changes to the city’s Personal Time Off (PTO) policy that had been developed over the course of several months. The chief told City Council on Nov. 12 the changes would not be equitable for Winchester’s career firefighters and paramedics, who work more hours per year than other city employees — 2,496 hours annually, compared to 2,080 for most city staff — but, under the revised PTO, would accrue the same amount of annual vacation and sick leave as everyone else.

After a council member asked Garrett for his opinion about the proposed PTO changes, Garrett recommended taking more time to flesh out the plan so it would be fair to all city employees.

“I need every man and woman of this department to be behind me, and this is one of those wages, benefits, salary issues that could be a game-changer for us,” Garrett told council.

City Council asked staff to return in two weeks with some alternative PTO suggestions that addressed the Fire and Rescue Department’s concerns.

The next day, Nov. 13, six of Winchester’s department heads — Garrett, Human Resources Director Paula Nofsinger, Police Chief John Piper, Public Services Director Perry Eisenach, Social Services Director Amber Dopkowski and Emergency Communications Director Erin Malloy — met in Rouss City Hall to discuss alternatives to the PTO proposal.

During that meeting, Garrett reportedly said the PTO revisions would hurt his ability to recruit and retain firefighters. Some of the other department heads criticized his opposition and said he had interfered with months of progress on the PTO proposal by sharing his concerns with City Council.

Freeman wrote on Tuesday, “The department heads did not view the firefighters’ comments as criticisms; rather, they were viewed as input which was incorporated into what was recommended to and ultimately adopted by council.”

Following the 30-minute meeting of department heads, which ended before any alternative PTO proposals were discussed, participants were reportedly asked to submit statements to Freeman describing their discussions during the session.

One week later, on Nov. 21, Freeman reportedly told Garrett to decide if he would rather be a city employee or submit his resignation. According to Winchester’s personnel policies, this form of disciplinary action is referred to as Decision Day.

Garrett did not report to his office for the next five days, during which time Assistant Fire Chief Eddie McClellan served as interim chief of the city’s Fire and Rescue Department.

In her email on Tuesday, Freeman maintained that Garrett was not relieved of duty, and one of the days he was absent, Nov. 26, was for a prearranged day off. She offered no explanation for him being out of the office on the two other business days, Friday, Nov. 22, and Monday, Nov. 25.

Freeman also denied appointing an interim chief during Garrett’s absence.

“It is the city’s longstanding practice to have the second in command of a department or other high ranking department member serve as the point of contact in the absence of the department head,” she wrote.

On Nov. 26, which Freeman said was a day off for Garrett, he again met with her to give her his decision. He refused to resign and was returned to active duty after signing a document agreeing to abide by the rules and regulations of his employer.

On Dec. 10, City Council approved the revised PTO plan but exempted the Fire and Rescue Department, meaning firefighters and paramedics would continue to follow Winchester’s former PTO policy.

Garrett is still under a nine-month probationary period as a new city employee, which began when he was sworn in as chief on June 3. His probation ends on March 3, at which time he can be terminated without cause.

This is not the first time that career personnel with Winchester’s Fire and Rescue Department have reportedly run afoul of City Hall for sharing their opinions at City Council meetings. Four people who are still employees of the department claim they were chastised for attending a council meeting in May 2017 to protest changes to the department’s performance incentives and holiday pay policy that they said would lead to firefighters and paramedics quitting their jobs.

All four said they were summoned to the Timbrook Public Safety Center the day after the council meeting to speak with Nofsinger, then-Fire and Rescue Chief Allen Baldwin and then-Assistant Chief Scott Kensinger. Each person was questioned about why they attended the council meeting, then told they had embarrassed the department.

Three of the career personnel shared their opinions during the public comment portion of City Council’s meeting. The fourth did not speak publicly, but said he or she was still reprimanded for attending the meeting and sitting with more than two dozen other firefighters and paramedics.

“It’s all an intimidation factor to stop us from exercising our First Amendment rights,” one of the four said Monday on condition of anonymity.

“No one has been reprimanded or disciplined for speaking at a council meeting. I have never advised any personnel to not attend or speak at City Council meetings,” Freeman wrote on Tuesday. “However, I have always advised that if anyone does choose to speak during public comment at a council meeting or in any public setting to ensure that the statements they are making are true, as spreading half truths or misinformation undermines their credibility and reflects poorly on the city as a whole.”

In the nearly three years since firefighters and paramedics opposed the incentive and holiday pay changes that were adopted by council, Winchester Professional Firefighters and Paramedics-IAFF Local 3401 has reported that at least 26 Fire and Rescue Department employees have resigned, representing a loss of more than a third of the department’s 63 personnel qualified to respond to fires and medical emergencies within the city.

As Garrett nears the end of his nine-month probationary period, career personnel and volunteers with the Winchester Fire and Rescue Department have rallied behind him, showing up en masse at City Council meetings to demand an investigation into Freeman’s conduct, and posting their complaints on social media.

“Chief Garrett has a very strong following of staff members who respect him for the man he is and the job he is trying to do,” volunteer Cheryl Anderson wrote in a Jan. 28 email to members of City Council. “He has the force of the firefighters union behind him as well as [the] citizens of Winchester.”

Garrett declined to comment for this report. He was a 30-year veteran of the Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department before coming to Winchester and was sworn in six months after Baldwin left the city to become an assistant chief with the Stafford County Fire and Rescue Department.

Freeman is in her final weeks as city manager. She has accepted a job as deputy city manager for Greenville, South Carolina, and her last day in Winchester is expected to be on March 16.

— Contact Brian Brehm at

(16) comments


9 month probationary period...when you hired someone partially because of race shouldnt we learn from these things that that gives the upper hand to the token hire AND look at what happened in Charlottesville when they brought in a police chief celebrated for being a "first" and then they caught him on tape telling the officers to stand down and let the antifa overract then they can shut tt all down. The people of Charlottesville ATE the cost of firing that incompetent much as Winchester is gonna eat it when this incompetent is let go. 9 MONTHS! Probation is up..let this trouble maker go.


You need to meet Chief Garrett and see the kind of man he is first hand. But you won’t because you are most likely an Eden Freeman supporter.


83% of Winchester City is Euro and the hll did they come to pick an afro american not even from this area as fire chief? SERVES the community right that as usual he is working the town to HIS...HIS advantage. NOT the communities. SO maybe we need to get rid of him and the guilty democrats that put him in place...all in the name of Diversity, right.


Fortunately for Winchester, Her Majesty is set to leave in a month. Unfortunately, four members of the City Council do not stand for election this year, and it is not clear if any of the others will face serious opposition. The current Mayor is mysteriously and dangerously smitten with the outgoing City Manager, who is rumored to be leaving town one step ahead the proverbial Sheriff.


@winchesterva. My observations on Chief Garrett are based on his short tenure here in Winchester and that there has been more attention to him than any other hire in years. It’s always possible that Eden made a bad hire? Sure, it happens. We have all worked with someone that we think is a great person until they show who they really are. The newspapers “sources” are just someone with a biased opinion and no facts. I can’t put my finger on it but I swear I just saw an episode of political episode before. Can I be a source and claim an accusation without merit? The Chief is playing everyone who will listen to him and those followers may soon find out he is not the great leader of the fire dept. I understand the devotion to the brotherhood in the fire and rescue dept but I know that some in the ranks know better. Time will tell. Hopefully before his 90 days are up.


How in the world could anyone conclude that Garrett is a "rat" Snowflake? What exactly has Garrett done to warrant such a comment? Defend himself and stand up for his firefighters? Refuse to be bullied into doing something he believes is wrong?

He has only been here a short while, so what other than trying to do what is right could be his motivation? REGARDLESS, even if what you are saying is true . . ."he's a rat" (which I absolutely do not agree with) then Freeman who recently hired him is an extremely poor judge of character. Either way, this calamity falls squarely in her lap. It's time for Council to quit making excuses for the Princess and start doing their job.


Lmao. It’s so obvious that these sources got their info from the Chief. Gee, the Winchester Star only getting anonymous sources for what happened in a private meeting with other personnel. I smell a rat and his name is Garrett. He is as dirty as it comes to politics. He knows how to use the court of public opinion (his firefighters and cronies) to stir up the masses. No shame for the chief.


I agree. Princess Freeman has done nothing but sit atop her high horse from the time she got here. Council should never have let her get so out of control. It is their job to manage the Manager. not the other way around I hope they keep this in mind when they select her replacement otherwise, we should consider replacing them.


It would be nice if the same pressure would be applied to the WPS superintendent as to why a CONVICTED SEXUAL PREDATOR is still allowed to freely roam the halls of Handley High School while his victim was FORCED TO GO TO A PRIVATE SCHOOL. It should be the other way around. Why is this allowed to continue?

Steve Cunningham

This is getting old Conservative, but keep beating this dead horse on a thread that has nothing to do with your hurt feelings.


Don't like it, don't read it. The superintendent should be fired for coddling a convicted sexual predator and ignoring the rights of his victim.

Steve Cunningham

I usually do avoid your stupidity, but since this one was so off topic it caught me by surprise.


WHen the left wants attention they riot and scream and act like clowns. SO if you want attention for this....


awwww, so if its your lil cause sitting out front of city hall belly aching about why the police did their job...oh then its a cause worthy of going over and over, right. Cheers


Eden Freeman the City of Winchester will be a better place when you vacate your current position, which can't happen soon enough, you're despicable and a disgusting example of what happens when one person has too much authority over a municipality. Hopefully the people of Greenville know what they're getting and keep you in check. Good riddance.


Finally something is being put out regarding the suspension of Chief Garrett. Keep pushing for more answers. Eden Freeman and City Council has to stop lying at some point.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.